Death sentence can’t be commuted in terror cases: SC
New Delhi: Long delay in disposing off mercy pleas by President or
Governor of persons convicted under anti-terror laws or similar statutes
cannot be a ground for commutation of death sentence, the Supreme Court
held today.
A two-judge bench of the apex court gave this landmark judgement while rejecting the plea of Khalistani terrorist and death row convict Devinderpal Singh Bhullar in a judgement that paves the way for his execution and can have a bearing on the fate of over 20 convicts facing execution.
A two-judge bench of the apex court gave this landmark judgement while rejecting the plea of Khalistani terrorist and death row convict Devinderpal Singh Bhullar in a judgement that paves the way for his execution and can have a bearing on the fate of over 20 convicts facing execution.
Three persons are awaiting execution
after conviction under TADA in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case while
sandalwood smuggler Veerappan’s associates are facing death in a
Karnataka jail under the provisions of the same law.
Observing
that India is one of the worst victims of terrorism, the apex court held
that not to entertain the mercy plea of people convicted terrorist and
other serious offences by the President or the Governor cannot be
characterised as arbitrary and the Court cannot exercise power of
judicial review only on the ground of undue delay.
The bench
comprising bench of justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya said that
the apex court’s earlier judgements holding that long delay may be one
of the grounds for commutation of the death sentence cannot be invoked
in cases where a person is convicted for offence under TADA or similar
statutes.
“We are also of the view that the rule enunciated in
Sher Singh’s case, Triveniben’s case and some other judgements that long
delay may be one of the grounds for commutation of the sentence of
death into life imprisonment cannot be invoked in cases where a person
is convicted for offence under TADA or similar statutes.
“Such
cases stand on an altogether different plane and cannot be compared with
murders committed due to personal animosity or over property and
personal disputes,” the apex court bench said.
The bench said
that it is a “paradox” that people, who themselves had now shown any
mercy while killing people, are pleading for mercy and pulled up
activists for raising the issues of human rights of the terrorists who
had not shown any respect for human lives.
They use bullets,
bombs and other weapons of mass killing for achieving their perverted
political and other goals or wage war against the State.
“While
doing(killing) so, they do not show any respect for human lives. Before
killing the victims, they do not think even for a second about the
parents, wives, children and other near and dear ones of the victims.
The
families of those killed suffer the agony for their entire life, apart
from financial and other losses. It is paradoxical that the people who
do not show any mercy or compassion for others plead for mercy and
project delay in disposal mercy petition as a ground for commutation of
the sentence of death,” the bench said.
Courtesy: The Free Press Journal